Wyoming

Defending Wyoming’s access to our public lands

By U.S. Senator John Barrasso & U.S. Representative Harriet Hageman, both R-Wyo.
Posted 5/22/24

In Wyoming, we have always relied on access to America’s public lands for our way of life and our livelihood. It is essential for energy and mineral development, ranching and agriculture, …

This item is available in full to subscribers.

Please log in to continue

Log in
Wyoming

Defending Wyoming’s access to our public lands

Posted

In Wyoming, we have always relied on access to America’s public lands for our way of life and our livelihood. It is essential for energy and mineral development, ranching and agriculture, hunting and fishing, hiking and climbing, and so much more. 

Unelected, unaccountable Washington bureaucrats are now jeopardizing Wyoming’s access to that land. They want to hijack Wyoming’s decision-making surrounding public land management and transfer it to climate zealots.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM)’s new Rock Springs Resource Management Plan (RMP) is one example of Washington’s outrageous attacks on Wyoming’s public lands. This misguided plan, which was proposed last year, would block multiple-use across three million acres in southwest Wyoming.

It is essentially a land lockdown, turning thousands of acres of federal land in Wyoming from multiple-use into non-use. This is exactly what radical environmentalists have been demanding.  

Both of us questioned Secretary of the Interior Deb Haaland about the Rock Springs RMP in the House and Senate Natural Resources committees. Secretary Haaland’s cluelessness about the Rock Springs RMP was remarkable. 

During the House committee hearing, Secretary Haaland was asked directly about whether she had heard of the Rock Springs RMP. Stunningly, she replied, “No I have not.” The next day, in the Senate, Secretary Haaland was pressed further about this outrageous proposal. She dodged the questions.

In both hearings, Secretary Haaland displayed an unacceptable lack of familiarity with the Rock Springs RMP and the problems it presents for Wyoming. Yet as we told Secretary Haaland, she may not be familiar with this proposed rule, but the people of Wyoming certainly are. We strongly oppose it.

The Rock Springs RMP is a classic example of government regulators snatching failure from the jaws of success. It was intended to be the product of 12 years of hard work by local communities, local stakeholders, land managers, ranchers, conservationists, and energy producers alike.

Instead, the Biden administration ignored more than a decade’s worth of practical, Wyoming solutions. In its place, it substituted a punishing Washington mandate that could severely restrict mining, oil and natural gas development, recreation, grazing, and most other economically viable activities.

Wyoming has more than 18 million acres of BLM land. We have been managing, developing, grazing, producing energy from, and respecting these lands for a very long time. We know how to responsibly manage them so our grandchildren can enjoy them. Biden’s BLM ignores these facts as well as the law by pushing forward with a radical agenda.  

Sadly, the problem of overregulation does not end with the Rock Springs RMP.

Another example of President Biden’s onslaught of regulatory overreach is the BLM’s sweeping “Public Lands Rule”. This rule, which was recently finalized, will do great damage to Wyoming’s communities and economy. Ranchers who graze their cattle, energy producers who power our nation, and everyday Americans who enjoy the use of our public lands will pay the price for Joe Biden’s all-out war on our Wyoming and Western way of life.

Wyoming remains the gold standard for the responsible use of our public lands, while also being one of the largest energy-producing states in the country.

We intend to keep fighting against the Biden administration’s mandate madness, which aims to fundamentally transform this great Republic one regulation at a time. We will continue to introduce legislation to reverse these rules and replace them with a balanced approach that puts Wyoming, not Washington, in the driver’s seat.